Snowbird pilot injured by ejection due to seat malfunction
Investigators of the Canadian Department of National Defense determined that the crash of the CT-114 Tutor belonging to the Snowbird aerobatic team was caused by an engine malfunction. Moreover, the pilot’s ejection was obstructed by the parachute lines, resulting in minor injuries.
The Royal Canadian Air Force released the official crash report on june 29, 2020, regarding the crash that occurred in Georgia, United States, on October 13, 2019.
After carrying out an inverted flight for a routine check, the pilot rolled level and applied full thrust to rejoin the rest of the Snowbird formation. But the aircraft suffered a loss of engine thrust. Due to the altitude being too low to attempt a safe recovery, the pilot chose to eject. However, an anomaly in the ejection sequence resulted in minor injuries. The aircraft crashed in a field and was destroyed, causing no other damage.
The investigators found that the most probable cause of the crash was a fuel delivery system failure in the jet’s engine. Though they could not determine exactly what caused the malfunction, signs of previous damage from a possible fuel leak were found.
Additionally, it was determined that “one or more parachute pack retaining cones [had] been released prior to the activation” of the ejection seat, resulting in its entanglement with the suspension lines. Following the finding, the life support system of the whole fleet was reviewed.
The investigators recommend an inspection of the Snowbird CT114 Tutor engines to identify potential fuel leaks or damages that could explain the incident.
On May 17, 2020, another CT-144 Tutor aircraft of the Canadian Snowbirds crashed during an exhibition flight. Both occupants managed to eject, but one crew member was killed. The report stated that the crash was likely caused by a bird strike. However, the performance of the ejection system is still under review.
Erratum: Martin Bakin reached out to deny that the ejection seat involved in the incident was one of their products.
Airbus A320neo vs Boeing 737 MAX: can you tell them apart? [Quiz]
Both the Airbus A320neo and the Boeing 737 MAX introduced unprecedented economics into the narrow-body market. But can y...
Qantas’ 787s to be stored for no less than 12 months
With resizing and restructuring to ensue, Australia based airline Qantas is preparing its Boeing 787-9 fleet for storage...
How the pandemic highlighted Ryanair’s major weakness
While in 2019 Ryanair became the most popular airline in Europe in terms of passenger numbers, the COVID-19 pandemic hig...
ALC: almost 60% of airlines got lease payment deferrals
Despite the fact that Air Lease Corporation (ALC) agreed on an abundance of lease payment deferrals, the lessor managed...
Atlas Air Boeing 747 slams three engines into ground in Shanghai
An Atlas Air Boeing 747-400F suffered an engine pod strike to three out four of its engines as it attempted to land in S...