The first strike of Operation Southern Spear was announced by Washington on September 2, 2025, after a US naval vessel destroyed a suspected drug-smuggling boat in the Caribbean.
A newly published New York Times report is now drawing attention not to the target, but to the platform that carried out the attack. Citing officials briefed on the mission, the NYT says the United States used “a secret aircraft painted to look like a civilian plane,” with no external weapons and a tube-launched internal munition.
This unusual configuration for a modern US strike aircraft has prompted some legal experts to question whether operating a military asset in civilian guise risks edging toward perfidy under the law of armed conflict.
This article looks at what the NYT account actually says about the aircraft and its weapons, and where the picture remains unclear.
Context: Operation Southern Spear’s first strike
U.S. Southern Command (SOUTHCOM) has announced and published footage of the first ever strike against an alleged narco-terrorist vessel in the Eastern Pacific under Operation Southern Spear, and the twenty-second strike carried out against a vessel in the region since August.… pic.twitter.com/gno9lssvYc
— OSINTdefender (@sentdefender) November 17, 2025
On September 2, 2025, the US government announced that a US naval vessel had struck and destroyed a speedboat in the Caribbean that it alleged was smuggling drugs from Venezuela, with President Donald Trump later saying the attack destroyed a significant quantity of narcotics bound for the United States and killed 11 members of the Tren de Aragua group.
US Secretary of State Marco Rubio characterized the action by saying that, instead of interdicting the vessel, “on the president’s orders, we blew it up. And it’ll happen again.”
A second strike reportedly targeted survivors who were still clinging to the wreck, raising concerns under the law of armed conflict about the treatment of shipwrecked persons. That information, however, was rejected by the Pentagon. Spokesperson Sean Parnell said “this entire narrative is completely false,” while Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth dismissed the allegations as “fabricated, inflammatory, and derogatory” attempts to discredit US forces.
What the NYT says about the aircraft
Citing officials briefed on the mission, the NYT adds a key detail to the government’s account: the initial strike was carried out by a US military aircraft that, to outside observers, looked like a civilian aircraft.
The key aviation details attributed to officials are:
- The aircraft was a US military platform.
- It was painted to look like a civilian aircraft.
- It had no external weapons visible on the wings.
- Munitions were fired from inside the fuselage, not from underwing pylons.
From the perspective of the boat’s crew, the aircraft would have appeared to be an ordinary aircraft until it fired.
The three technical features highlighted by the NYT, civilian-like appearance, no external pylons, and an internal launch system, are unusual in combination for a modern US military aircraft, particularly for a platform used for precision strike at sea.
How the Boeing P-8 Poseidon compares
The most likely contender is the Boeing P-8A Poseidon, a maritime patrol aircraft derived from the Boeing 737-800. The P-8 incorporates an internal weapons bay and carries stores within the fuselage, which aligns with the NYT’s mention of an internal launch system. Arguably, it also preserves the visual silhouette of a commercial narrowbody, and US Navy aircraft typically wear light grey paint with relatively discreet national markings, which can make them appear less overtly military at a distance
However, based solely on publicly documented information, the P-8’s internal bay is primarily configured for anti-submarine warfare stores, including Mk 54 lightweight torpedoes and related payloads. Known surface-attack weapons associated with the P-8, such as Harpoon anti-ship missiles, are carried externally on underwing pylons rather than launched internally. The NYT’s description of a clean-wing aircraft with a fuselage launch does not correspond to any publicly disclosed P-8 loadout.
What else might fit that description?
Another aircraft now attracting attention in this context is the P-9A “Pale Ale”, a little-publicized US Air Force Dash 8 Q202 variant used by the USAF Air Combat Command for maritime patrol and detection and monitoring in support of US Southern Command’s counter-drug missions.
#USAF P-9A Pale Ale
— FlightWatcher (@Flightwatcher1) December 10, 2025
Código de llamada: BAT86 y 91
Matriculas: N986HA y N991HA
Hex: #adc21e y #add70a
Desde Balboa🇵🇦 hasta Curaçao🇨🇼, aviones de vigilancia marítima #Curaçao #SOUTHCOM pic.twitter.com/C7v3gvJp3l
Four Dash 8 Q200-series airframes, retaining US civil registrations and mostly white special-mission liveries, were modified by Sierra Nevada Corporation from 2023 onwards, with no visible weapon bays or hardpoints and an officially stated role focused on surveillance rather than strike.
The New York Times highlighted marketing material for a Dash 8 Common Launch Tube (CLT) door kit from Fulcrum Concepts, which replaces the rear door with a low-visibility module integrating multiple launch tubes to fire “air-launched effects” from inside the fuselage while preserving the aircraft’s civilian-like appearance.
That does not prove that P-9A aircraft carry this kit, or that it was used in the September 2025 strike, but it shows that an armed Dash 8 configured as a clean-wing strike aircraft is an architecture already being marketed for that airframe.
The US Air Force Special Operations Command (AFSOC) also operates a small fleet of Cessna AC-208 Combat Caravans painted in civilian-style colors.
Modified by MAG Aerospace, these aircraft also integrate a CLT rack that can fire two standoff precision guided munitions from an internal launch system using the MC-208 Guardian’s air-operable roll-up door. However, none are known to have been in the area during the September 2025 strike.
A final possibility is that the “aircraft that looked like a civilian plane” described to the NYT was not the platform that actually released the weapon. Videos of Southern Spear strikes shared by US officials appear to be filmed from a P-8 Poseidon or similar maritime patrol aircraft, with the impact visible but no launch in frame, suggesting a separate “shooter” such as an MQ-9 Reaper or another off-board asset.